Continuing the discussion from Cryptographic Autonomy License draft v1.0-Beta:
I would strongly recommend against express the core ethical injunction of the license in dusty legal terms of art. I’m a lawyer and I liked Property class plenty well. But other than remember that’s where I last heard “quiet enjoyment”, I couldn’t tell you where the analogy leads on user data.
What would this look like in plain terms? How do those looking for a license like CAL express it? Is that better material for a preamble, since it’s likely somewhat vague, and won’t add much to a list of specific injunctions and prohibitions?