Continuing the discussion from Cryptographic Autonomy License draft v1.0-Beta:
As I see it, the “cryptographic autonomy” in “Cryptographic Autonomy License” means the above. A few thoughts there:
- [ ] What would be actually good headings for each of the rules?
- [ ] Where did this content and structure for expressing it come from? Were the clients who want it in a license riffing on any particular non-legal writing?
- [ ] Why not get this close to the very top of the license?